Clitheroe Royal Grammar School

Bob on 12th September 2022 at 13:06

No idea what you're talking about but you have been caught out, clearly you're the multiple poster projecting your wrong doing onto others.

Jenny - I agree with Jason. I can understand you being unhappy about spending money on kit that is not used but, other than that, it sounds like a sensible school policy on kit and showers. It may seem old-fashioned but that does not make it bad!

Martin/Andy.

Clearly Martin is the very same person who has been disruptive to the other thread with the belligerent attitude. The style of writing, poor attitude to others, tone and way the posts are replied to match up completely.

Stop taking people for fools.

Jenny if your son is doing his PE barechested and barefoot and is taking a naked shower among his classmates afterwards then that is perfectly normal and nothing to worry about in the least. I commend the school for its healthy attitude. I think you sound like you agree. What is concerning is that this PE set up is now considered by quite a few to be an extreme way to do it.

James on 8th September 2022 at 13:41

A post from the class bully I see.

Bob on 8th September 2022 at 14:29
Jason on 8th September 2022 at 22:56
John on 9th September 2022 at 11:45
Andre on 10th September 2022 at 16:59

And lo and behold in a short space of time we have those cowering in his shadow supporting his stance.

Grow up gentlemen and act as adults now.

Comment by: Fiona on 11th September 2022 at 12:06
Jenny - were your son, or any of his classmates, bothered in any way by either the bare-chested PE experience or the subsequent, presumably clothes-free, shower?

What other kind of shower is ther apart from clothes free Fiona? The biggest complaint I got about that was that I sent him off with too big a towel filling his bag up and that he has to lug a towel around all day in his bag. Nothing about actual showering itself - yet anyway. When I read what you said it made me doubt my presumption so I did ask what seems a silly question and the answer was nothing, no clothes on to shower. I suppose if you are a school that wants your children to shower after their PE it would be rather silly to say you could keep something on, a pair of pants or something alike. But then they would get wet and have to come off anyway wouldn't they.

He did not volunteer any information about his school day very enthusiastically but when I did sit down and talk about it he spoke freely about his whole day. You mentioned the lack of the vest I sent him with for PE. He was quite anxious about that as it was not expected because a vest was mentioned as part of the inside PE kit to be worn but the PE teacher made his own choice and apparently they were told to just leave them in their bags and not even bring them to the place they did PE, the school's sports hall.

His reaction to me, to doing his PE lesson without his vest, wearing nothing on top, was something I did not expect to hear and did raise my eyebrows just a little. He said and I quote verbatim, "it felt a bit gay". I was surprised as this is not the language I normally hear from my son and I don't think I have ever heard him use words like that before. I asked why he was saying that and it was because there were so many boys all the same together bared chest with each other without vests on and there was an element of physical contact during the lesson. I told him not to be silly and stop talking like that. I did wonder if other boys had said that while in the class or afterwards and he just picked up their words or whether they were infact his own.

I'm going to keep a keen eye out for how things settle down at his school. I'll still be sending him to school each Wednesday with what I've been told to provide and I will keep an eye out to see if the vest comes home needing a wash or comes home clean and fresh still, but I will just ask what he's up to and hope for an honest reply.

I do wonder about his associating his PE lesson with the comment he made to me though and have been wondering if he might also have been reading something online I'm unaware of to give him that kind of view.

Fiona he has a full outdoors kit, two different kits infact. After spending the money I have I will not be pleased if he ends up doing PE outdoors without what I've been told to provide. My husband went to the same school years ago when it had a completely different name pre-academy status and tells me of his own PE in the way many remember ages ago now, and distance running with his PE top hanging off his waist when told to but I would be extremely surprised and rather annoyed if I found out my son was put through that kind of old style behaviour.

George, it's a mixed academy school. I've actually no idea if his PE will keep the genders separate in the future or whether they will share at any point like they did at his lower schools up until now.

I'm probably one of the oldest mother's as I had my only child in my mid 40's.

Jenny - Both my brother and my father did PE topless at secondary school as a matter of course, but that was back in the dark ages of the 20th century. At my 16 y.o. son's secondary school, PE tops have always been mandatory for outdoor activities like cross-country running etc., but in the gym have been optional and, apparently, rarely worn, since before he started there.

Jenny, does your son attend a boys' school? If girls attend too, do they do PE separately from the boys or do both genders do it together?

Good call from you both Andre and David, I concur with that.

Jenny - I was interested in your description of the lesson as 'old fashioned'. I would be surprised if all his lessons were the same as that, as it seems you had a school vest ready, presumably on his new kit list like schools give out. Actually what surprised me was that he got thrown in like that with his first lesson back to school but perhaps they mean to start as they go on.

I remember starting at my own senior school back in the seventies and our PE teachers seemed to break us into the new ways surprisingly gradually. Many of the early lessons were casual, relaxed affairs, not especially competitive, we wore precisely what the uniform list had said we should, shorts, white socks, trainers and stripey vest. It continued like that for much of the first half of the term. There were showers in our changing room but they didn't get touched either, despite bringing a towel in. I'll admit I was a bit relieved but doubted it would last, and was right. We came back into school after a week off and there was a dramatic transformation, same teachers and all that but suddenly the lessons upped a significant gear and the showers kicked in for us with no opting out allowed by anyone in class at all.

I think you have a healthy attitude and are right not to be too concerned but just be aware of things.

Jenny - were your son, or any of his classmates, bothered in any way by either the bare-chested PE experience or the subsequent, presumably clothes-free, shower?

Comment by: Jason on 20th May 2022 at 22:22
Why would anyone doubt barechested school PE still exists, why shouldn't it?


My 12 year old started secondary school last week at a school in Warwickshire and took his first PE lesson on Wednesday when he was packed off with a small towel, some shorts and a thin vest for his indoor class taken in the school sports hall. He came home later to tell me he and the boys spent the lesson not wearing the vest and conducted class along with everyone else with a bare chest and feet, followed by a group shower together afterwards under supervision. It seems a little old fashioned but he coped and as they were all the same I see no reason to feel concerned about it. I already knew he was going to a school that promoted an after PE shower policy for all. I was in two minds on the issue but remain open minded and will see how the year progresses. I will be very surprised if all his PE indoors lessons turn out like his first one and will be asking him and monitoring.

Yes, it's the usual post puberty forced naked swimming in British schools that the fantasists love to propagate on parts of this site every now and again.

There is an authenticity in Nigel's post that is lacking in Martin's.

Everything you wrote Steven is perfect common sense and absolutely true. It's hilarious to see someone completely misunderstand what you wrote. Calling people amateur psychologists is a swipe I've seen a couple of times on this site before. Not sure what makes some people so prickly when this kind of thing gets discussed.

Good Lord, Steven is 100% on side with Martin's own view and then gets insulted for it. Are you unable to read properly or something? Bonkers response.

Why the amateur psychology put down?

What is happening to polite disagreement in this world?

But I've got to say, where was the disagreement in the first place! A very odd response indeed.

Martin, are you dyslexic or something? That post by Steven was entirely in agreement with your own viewpoint and was perfectly decent and well written.

So if you can't come on here and act with a bit of decency then sod off and say nothing at all.

Steven on 8th September 2022 at 01:28

This is exactly the sort of post I referred to in my first paragraph and my only response is that there won't be one. Please take your amateur psychology elsewhere.

There is a considerable difference between being the age of 8 swimming without anything on and being the age of 11 doing so. What age did you finish doing that at Martin and was it a free choice, school rules or just down to teacher choice? The same child at the age of 8 doing so might have a completely different attitude to it only three or four years later. In Nigel's case it just seems so normal and natural at that time, so much so that they probably didn't really even think much about what they were doing one imagines. Only later, long afterwards does a re-evaluation start taking place and make something completely non controversial suddenly seem controversial, and the fact that aspect gets mentioned proves it.

Nowadays swimming at many schools is becoming rare or non existent. I know this from a youngster in my extended family, aged 15 who has never had a school swim lesson and the only time he went in the pool for a lesson was when it was paid for over a number of weeks when he was about 7. They're too scared to even be seen ever so briefly having a quick shower and the taking of tops off is seen as something to avoid.

These days there would be voices that would decry the recent experience of swimming, refuse to believe it happened of decide the teachers were guilty of some sort of abuse but of course none of that was true.

I didn't get to swim at school until I was eleven at an all boys grammar school in 1965 and there were certainly no trunks on the uniform list, no one thought anything of it, it was just what happened. No questions, we just got on with it. The benefits of learning to swim far outweighed any worries about being naked in the water.

Duncan that was a nice film you found there. I swam in a strange looking pool just like that, but bigger and outside back in my primary school in 1972 and 1973 when I was about 7 or 8 years of age.

Boys and girls would actually be in that pool alongside each other naked. Not always but a lot of the time. Try explaining that nowadays without a sceptical reaction but it was true. I even remember some of our mothers coming to see us at school in the pool with our teacher one day all around the edge marvelling at our improved swimming ability and my own mother lifting me out of the pool to dry off with nothing on at all just like taking me from the bath at home. Many times I also remember being in that pool with some of us naked and others not. How this came about I am unable to remember or how it happened like that. Monday mornings was a set lesson but we could also do random lessons when our teacher simply asked if we wanted to go to the pool situated just outside close to our classrooms enclosed by a fence giving privacy from anyone else at school. Class always seemed enthusiastic about it. We changed at poolside together, I think on the random days we used it that was the time we must have just cast everything off and got in. I have no idea if we were told to do it like that or it just happened without much thought. Once in the water I don't think it made any difference to me whether I had my swim trunks on or not. My older brother holds very similar memories to me from 1970 and 1971 and my younger sister from 1974 and 1975 using that same pool as me. They got rid of it in 1980 for some sad reason that made no sense but I think the upkeep was proving harder and by then there was a new town pool close by just opened which got used instead. I remember hearing that they were getting rid of it and being baffled by the decision. A lovely thing to have in your school to use at a moments notice like we did so many times.

This interesting film from British Pathé might prompt further discussion. It shows children at a North London school in 1962 learning to swim in a portable pool set up in a classroom: https://www.britishpathe.com/video/school-pool

I e-mailed British Pathé just to make sure they had no objection to my posting here that link to the film (the film is a lower-resolution preview, the same length as the original).

Why that question George. Of course girls share some lessons in school. Why do some men/boys get so worked up by the slightest chance about being in a PE lesson and having to take a top off and that there might be some girls who see the upper body for a bit. Am I missing something here, is it such a big deal? It's something that I did a fair few times and literally nothing was made of it. Maybe some girls were keeping a secret black book to themselves and enjoying the nipple count amongst themselves, who knows what they thought, I didn't care, I was in PE not sitting doing double maths like it.

Does this somehow relate to your own hang ups you had as a kid doing PE amongst others who saw you?

Amanda, did your sons attend a boys' school or did female students attend too? If girls did attend, was PE gender segregated or were your boys made to be shirtless around female peers?

I suspect Ashley must have had a bad time swimming at school or something to actually write and believe what he, or was it she, wrote. A very sad, disappointing and fearful attitude to take. Please respond.

Tim,
I was subjected to wearing short trousers to age 13 or 14although they were not compulsory for the school uniform.
This was at the at the whim of my parents not by my choice.

People with your view, if you really believe it as you wrote it, are the problem not the solution Ashley.

Does anyone remember still wearing short trousers as part of the school uniform even in secondary school till age 13 or 14?
I was one of those boys who always wore school uniform shorts till age 13 or 14 and if I remember well most boys did the same with just a few starting to wear long trousers.
This was in the 60s.
I don't think that this was a school stipulation but just the taste of parents.

I don't think schools should do any swimming lessons nowadays, it should be left to parents to take them for lessons in their own time under their own supervision to keep them as safe as possible. If they have to do them at school I think an all in one body suit covering up the boys as well as girls is the way to go and should be the future. Just like the girls, boys don't need to take almost everything off to have a swimming lesson and learn properly in school. Plus if there are a few boys who hate showing their bodies it solves that too.

Tim, my apologies if I appeared insensitive. I just had in mind a few gentle words of kind encouragement to help overcome insecurities.