Burnley Grammar School

Childhood > Schools

6943 Comments

Burnley Grammar School
Burnley Grammar School
Year: 1959
Views: 1,584,767
Item #: 1607
There's pleny of room in the modern-styled gymnasium for muscle developing, where the boys are supervised by Mr. R. Parry, the physical education instruction.
Source: Lancashire Life Magazine, December 1959

Comment by: Leeds Lad on 29th August 2019 at 09:22

Children weren't so uptight back then. I once taught swimming, and every 8 weeks there was a "test night" (for gold, silver and bronze Personal Survival badges). One boy forgot his trunks and all I had in lost property was a girl's swimsuit. He willingly agreed to use that, rather than wait another 8 weeks. (Unfortunately though, he still failed on a technicality!)

Comment by: James on 28th August 2019 at 05:54

George Spelvin,I did attend nude swimming classes like the other James and I was allowed to wear a slip for the first few lessons until I got used to swimming nude.
Women teachers were present when attending and it was customary.
The slip that I wore for swimming did leave my bottom absolutely bare and it was never commented on,I was only allowed to wear it for a few swims so I could get used to nude swimming.

Comment by: John on 27th August 2019 at 21:27

Jamie,
When I was at school collective punishments were used as opposed to individuals being punished. If a few lads misbehaved we’d get a warning and if bad behaviour continued we’d all be punished. As we were already stripped to the waist for gym class it wasn’t possible for our PE teachers to threaten us with that, punishments normally consisted of a high volume of push ups, squat thrusts, star jumps until we were really exhausted.

Perhaps our teachers should have singled out the badly behaved lads and made them put a really thick sweatshirt on and then worked them hard. No
one wants to be singled out and made to look different to other kids in their class or year, that punishment would probably have been equally effective.

Being stripped to the waist was a much more comfortable way to do PE, it felt strange at age nine being made to do PE without a vest or a t shirt but we got used to it after the first lesson.

Comment by: Jamie on 27th August 2019 at 13:01

Reading Jason R's recollections from an all boys school, it's interesting that being stripped to the waist was clearly an integral part of punishment. This ties in closely with the practice at my school, although it sounds as if it was overall a bit more relaxed than Jason's. I started in 1989, when I was 12.
We usually wore vest, shorts, trainers (and gym socks) for regular PE lessons but this wasn't the case for PE detentions, which could involve laps of the field, press ups and sit ups, sprints in the gym, or more than one of the above. Sometimes there were shooting challenges with a ball and boys who failed to pass would get extra laps, press ups etc.
For a PE detention, you wore your usual kit - except the vest. Irrespective of whether detention was indoors or outdoors, you did it bare chested. I suppose this was a way of making us feel small and self conscious and, if we were outdoors, it meant other boys could see us and knew we were being punished.
There were also times during a regular PE lesson when a teacher might make you remove your top as a penalty for misbehaviour, not paying attention or something similar. I was made to play rugby bare chested a couple of times for answering back, which wasn't much fun in October or November, and it probably had the desired effect in that I made sure I shut up after that.
It occurs to me this may not have been so effective at a school where boys did PE stripped to the waist all the time!

Comment by: Mahatma on 27th August 2019 at 10:11

Yes! However, I swam nude for our public high school boys swim team and boys sem classes starting in 7 the grade. Nude swimming was used with a soap shower before swimming to keep the water clean and cut down on chlorine. It seemed normal at the time because society accepted it as normal. Contrary to what people today think this was considered standard across the US at this time in history. We did not allow ever at any of the schools girls to mix with the all boys nude swim classes and boys swim teams. The pool was just another part of the boys locker room.

Today for some reason swim teams are mostly boys and girls swim teams even though boys are naturally stronger than girls and it would seem only logical to have a separate girls team and a separate boys swim team or swim class. And it does not seem as if anyone takes a shower before swimming today?!?!?!??! I do not understand today's current logic except that we overcorrected to make sure that girls had 24/7 access to all swim pools at all times… they are Co Ed. And at the same time we did not allow the girls to swim nude!?!?! So there are increased costs for pool maintenance today.

Today inspite of better technology for filtration that many people are not taking soap showers and public pools are closed temporarily because the water is not safe or clean and this could easily be fixed with going back to soap showers before swimming.

So I still think there is a case to bring in nude swimming today. Maybe girls are naturally shy so maybe that's why they didn't have nude girls swimsuit? Nude male swimming has been the custom world wide for thousands of years and will continue in some way into the future and nude recreation is common in Europe, France, Australia, New Zealand and other places today.

The question about men swimming nude at beaches ….well it was common and considered normal for men to swim nude, but it was not a law, it was just a custom. We still have nude beaches in many parts of the world today.

Comment by: George Spelvin on 27th August 2019 at 04:09

Thanks, James!

That clears up a lot of confusion.
I still have a couple of more questions:
Did you attend nude swim classes which were interrupted by women teachers needing to confer with individual students, or was that another James?

And what does a slip look like on the other side?
Does it cover the culo also? Or does it leave it bare like a jockstrap?

I had to grow up under a domineering mother too, so I know how that is.
However, my parents were prudish. I was taught to believe that any desire to look or show was sinful.
So now I am left with a craving to look and show.

So we all have our similarities and our differences.

Comment by: James on 26th August 2019 at 14:21

George Spelvin,further to my previous message I would like to give you a more detailed account of my messages.
-- translucent gym shorts with nothing underneath.
-- being only allowed to wear shorts at home.
-- a school gym with huge windows through which girls could watch the boys.
- swimming class wearing slips at an all boys'school.
The slips that I wore were very miniscule and were triangular at the front with cords that went between the legs and then tied at the waist.
I wore these for ballet and swimming!
-- being forced to wear skimpy shorts until I graduated.

Comment by: Jeff on 26th August 2019 at 13:04

Toby,
My first jockstrap was a Litesome, got it when I was 13 in 1970. At school wearing underpants for PE was not allowed. Nothing was worn under the shorts until you needed support, then you wore a jockstrap. From third form onwards all boys were expected to wear a jockstrap for PE and other sports.

I have heard of boys wearing swimming trunks for support. A friend at another school wore trunks for a while until he got a jockstrap.

Comment by: James on 26th August 2019 at 10:47

George Spelvin,thank you for your interest,some of the messages you refer to are signed by'James B',but I didn't go on a bike ride in a swim suit'or have an'embarrassing medical',however most or the other messages apply to me.

Comment by: Leeds Lad on 26th August 2019 at 08:55

I still have one of these Litesome "antiques"! All nylon. It says "Golf model" on the label at the back. Never knew a supporter was recommended for golf!

Comment by: Dave on 25th August 2019 at 19:59

Hi Graham,
Litesome never made many "swim Jocks" and so they were rare to find but a friend of mine had one and although they were sung to wear and all nylon to dry fast the waist band was still too wide to wear under swim trunks but fine under swim shorts.

Comment by: George Spelvin on 25th August 2019 at 15:12

Hello, James!
Hello, moderators!

Is there more than one James on this board?
I am interested in several messages which are signed James, but some of those messages seem to contradict each other.
So I am trying to figure out which messages have been written by which James.
If you are one of the Jameses, I would appreciate it if you could tell me which of these messages you wrote.
If you are the only James and I am mistaken in thinking that there is more than one of you, I would appreciate it if you could write back.
If you are a moderator and have this information handy, I would appreciate it if you could write back.

--proudly riding a bike on Sunday, wearing a swim suit and nothing else (March 18, 2014).
--an embarrassing school medical inspection (May 19, 2014).
--translucent gym shorts with nothing underneath (January 2, 2012; July 18, 2014; September 25, 2014; September 27, 2014; January 28, 2015).
--being allowed to wear only shorts at home (March 28, 2016).
--girls admiring boys who are shirtless for gym class (September 22, 2009; April 7, 2013).
--a school gym with huge windows through which the girls could watch the boys (June 29, 2019).
--towel dancing by boys of the present generation (December 11, 2013).
--nude swimming class at a boarding school (September 6, 2013), which was often interrupted by women teachers ordering individual students to get out of the pool and talk (October 20, 2014; October 28, 2014; October 30, 2014; October 31, 2014), and sometimes visited by a matron who bragged that she had seen every boy who attended the school for the past 12 years (May 28, 2014).
--swimming class wearing slips at an all-boys’ school (February 5, 2017). What ARE slips anyway? You’ll have to excuse me. I’m from the other side of the Atlantic.
--coed dance class which the boys had to attend shirtless (July 26, 2015).
--being forced by his parents to wear skimpy shorts until he graduated. This one I have paginated (February 8, 2014, p. 36; September 4, 2014, p. 33; October 29, 2014, p. 32; November 16, 2014, p. 31; March 30, 2016, p. 25; April 1, 2016, p. 25; December 25, 2017, p. 14; April 8, 2018, p. 11; January 3, 2019, p. 5).

Thank you.

Comment by: Andrea on 25th August 2019 at 12:36

John,
At the time the mixed changing didn't bother me too much, as I was still totally flat-chested when I left primary school and became quite adept at pulling my shorts on before taking off my ordinary skirt or dress. I left primary school in 1971; when were you at primary?

When my son was at primary, the boys and girls got changed in separate areas for the final two years. Even so I remember a couple of the other mums saying they had bought their 9 year old daughters crop tops to wear during the final year of mixed changing. Unlike my classmates, very few wore ordinary vests.

Comment by: Ben on 25th August 2019 at 11:42

Hi Helen,
Maybe activities wasn't the word I should have used - I meant there were other PE situations where I had to go topless, not only for shirts against skins. For example, outdoor athletics in summer, or there was a gymnastics display where the girls wore leotards and boys wore just shorts.
When I first began to get hair on my chest there were only one or two other lads in the same boat, with more joining us as time went on! By that stage I think we were all used to stripping off in PE; it was a bit different when we started a few years earlier and yes, I certainly felt shy at first when I realised I'd have to go topless. But we just had to get on with it. I dread to think what reaction anyone would have got from the teacher if he'd asked to be excused being a skin on the grounds of not wanting to display his chest hair!

Comment by: Leeds Lad on 25th August 2019 at 09:37

I see a few people have been mentioning Litesome supporters. I still have an "antique" one! It is made of nylon (like the swim version, I suspect, but with a wider waistband). It actually says it's a "golf" model on the back label. I had no idea they were recommended for golf too!

Comment by: James on 25th August 2019 at 05:57

Hi David G,thank you for you reply,I attended secondary school from 1965 to 1970 in the midlands.
Like you we just wore shorts for dance and P.E,but we weren't allowed to wear pumps.

Comment by: Jason R on 25th August 2019 at 00:24

I started at an all boys school in 1988 shortly before my 9th birthday.

Though officially our kit was vest, shorts, trainers the reality was different. We were bare chested indoors and outside. Our PE teachers were all ex Army and didn't hesitate in enforcing a stripped to the waist regime.

It wasn't a warm September when we started and it wasn't long before we were out on the field exercising when the rain came down. Obviously with no vest on it made for quite a tough session but our teacher started to lecture us about the merits of being stripped to the waist! It was warmer in the gym but that only made you sweat quicker and by the halfway point in the lesson the whole class had sweat running down them.

The Head had a novel idea for punishment, you were handed over over to one of the PE teachers in our own time, where anything could happen from running up and down flights of stairs until you were told to stop or you physically couldn't move, then it was freezing shower afterwards, to remedial fitness, including laps of the field, which due to the size of the grounds was never popular amongst the boys or as a friend and I got once to shovel grit into the large bunkers for the winter. Each was done with you baring your upper body and make you "man up"

Helen, you've mentioned lads showing chest hair, a good few of my friends showed their chests off and they said it was a little weird during the first lesson but never bothered them after.

Comment by: John on 25th August 2019 at 00:17

Hi Andrea,
It was girls who had started to mature physically that changed into leotards. I think that it was wrong that girls and boys had to change together in the classroom when we’d reached the age of 10/11. The school should have been designed with a separate girls and boys changing room.

We should not have been allowed to wear the grey shorts that we’d gone to school in, boys should have changed into PE shorts. Most boys were happy to be shirtless for PE and it meant less washing for our mums too.

Comment by: Graham on 25th August 2019 at 00:02

Dave, Toby: my first jockstraps were Litesom. A bit over-engineered in some ways, and although I once saw a "swim jock" by Litesome, I was never able to get hold of one for myself.

Comment by: David G on 24th August 2019 at 21:17

James Hi, as a matter of interest, can I ask what years you went to school? I was in the senior school from 1961-66 in the north of England with a very similar experience to yours, in that boys were bare chested in shorts & pumps only & the girls were wearing much more. Our lessons were separate, to the girls, but occasionally we had lessons together. I don't think it bothered us boys much - but we didn't have a choice anyway.
I seem to recall it was more dance lessons if we were together.

Comment by: Dave on 24th August 2019 at 19:32

Hi Toby,
Yes I remember the Litesome jockstraps very well and I still have a couple from my school / college days.
It was the first jockstrap that I bought along with some shorts for running when I was 15/16 years old, wearing it felt quite strange at first but after a while I got used to it and felt very grown up I have worn jocks ever since.

Comment by: Michael on 24th August 2019 at 18:55

Toby.

Hi. Yes, I remember the Litesome jock. My schooldays were in the late 60's / 70's and I only wore a Jock when I later went to college.
If you would like to contact me please feel free.
Michael

Comment by: Andrea on 24th August 2019 at 12:26

Helen,
For outdoor PE and games we could wear PE skirts or culottes and a long sleeved top, but not tracksuit bottoms.
In fact were weren't even allowed to wear tights with our school uniform, just ankle socks in summer and long socks in winter!

With regard to going shirtless in the summer, I was a bit of a tomboy and would sometimes take my shirt of like the boys in the hot summer holidays. The last year I was able to do this was the year we left primary school (ages 11).
By the following summer I had to make sure I was wearing a swimsuit top underneath if I wanted to take my T shirt off.

Comment by: Andrea on 24th August 2019 at 12:13

John,
Was it mainly girls who had started to mature who changed into leotards, or was it younger girls too?

Comment by: Toby on 24th August 2019 at 07:47

Hi guys
Any of you remember the Litesome jockstrap?

Comment by: James on 24th August 2019 at 07:35

Hi Helen,thank you for your comments,I found it particularly
hard to strip to the waist for our sporting activities,especially when we shared the gym with girls.
There wouldn't have been any allowances made for boys for their age or whether they had hairy chests,it was a strict'shorts only rule'for all boys.
Even boys who were shy and self-conscious soon got used to this rule and wore just skimpy shorts, where girls were allowed to be more adequately attired.

Comment by: Helen on 23rd August 2019 at 23:01

Hi Ben & Matt, I wasn't against boys showing a hairy chest, I just thought it may be hard for those who were reluctant to strip to the waist. Ben, may I ask what were about the other activities you did topless and were there many in your group who were in the same boat. Matt, I'd be interested to read your experiences too.

Comment by: Ben on 23rd August 2019 at 14:23

Hi Helen, I'm slightly curious as to why you think maybe boys with chest hair might have been exempted from going topless in PE! Certainly it didn't make any difference at my school - all of us boys were expected to strip to the waist regardless for shirts and skins games, or sometimes for other activities. My chest hair began to appear when I was 15 and I was aware, as we all were, that girls would be watching closely when I was a skin and commenting on my body. If anything I think it was an incentive for us to work harder in PE as we wanted to impress the girls!

Comment by: Matt on 23rd August 2019 at 12:06

To Helen,

Why did you think that boys with hairy chests should not have had to strip to the waist?

Comment by: John on 22nd August 2019 at 23:40

Andrea,
At Primary School the girls did PE in vest and knickers and undressed in the classroom at the same times as boys did. A few girls went to girl’s toilets and changed into leotards. Some girls did PE barefoot but most changed into pumps.