Burnley Grammar School

Comment by: Christopher on 15th February 2024 at 23:18


I think you are right, Christopher, and I would go further - I think there have been, and will continue to be, changes with the post 2000 students. When you see six foot plus lads with beards, it would be very hard for even the most dictatorial teacher to try to intimidate them in the way our teachers did us, without making themselves look very foolish.

Comment by: Bill on 15th February 2024 at 19:08

It was more like mid April today than mid February like when I ran the London Marathon in that month. I'm certain all the ones you saw did so freely. I don't think you are allowed to run the London Marathon completely shirtless even if you place your number stuck onto your abdomen and back, even if the race is run on a hot one. If a runner was to remove his vest I think he might even be disqualified actually. I ran the race back in April 1996 (2:58:16) and it was actually quite a warm one that year. I only did it once. I achieved my sub three hour first time, couldn't quite believe it.

My theory is that there is a divide in attitudes between men who went to school before 1970 on here and those after that year.

I'm not sure what I must have weighed when I was 14 but I do know that at 16 a friend told me he had hit 10 stone and I thought he was massively overweight! Actually he was just tall, must have been close six feet at the time. I must have been considerably less to think this of him but I don't even remember standing on scales in the home or seeing any. Common sense and visuals can tell you if you are either significantly under or overweight, just the same as looking at fresh food, I don't need a date to tell me when it's any good, I need my eyes and hands to feel it.

One thing I do not approve of that does go on nowadays is forcibly weighing some quite young children in school. That is not the job of the school and could definitely cause problems if you are out of the so called acceptable range either way. I've had a friend's son weighed at the age of eight and then sent a letter home to say he was slightly overweight. I looked at this boy myself and he was no such thing in any way.

But even if you are weedy or a fatty I don't think that should simply mean an exemption to shirtless PE which should then only be allowed for the average looking ones. Imagine a PE teacher taking a shirtless class and allowing a fat boy to cover up, what message would that send to him, that he looks too awful to be seen.

Sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind I think, I really do, it's the only way to acceptance of everyone whatever they look like. My class didn't allow the fat boy to cover up on account of his obesity at the time, and it didn't allow many of the 'weeds' as they were known to do so either.

Comment by: Jason on 15th February 2024 at 04:32


We overlapped by one minute this morning, I see Jason, so proof that Alan isn't Jason and Jason isn't Alan. I read that blog by Tom over lunch, and you have to hand it to the Americans (and I am not soft-soaping Pauline, if she is still reading - I hope she is) - they can discuss, without embarrassment, and in a very matter-of-fact way, we couldn't , about what might seem strange personal hang-ups. It did cheer me up to read that so many people had the same issues as me. A few on HW have been open about it, I know, but you sense the derision in some circles who don't "get" it.

A couple of months ago I mentioned what I had seen driving around Dunstable where I do some part time flower delivering for a friends flower shop. Well I saw it again this afternoon not long after lunchtime beside Queensbury Academy School in Dunstable when I must have seen at the very least 30 boys running along the area, off to the vicinity of Buttercup Lane area, and at least two thirds of them, I'd say about 20 of them were doing this bare chested in the open public with two older men going with them, dressed. They all looked extremely competent at running and very trim and were going at a decent pace from what I could make out. I was on the road stationary at the time. When I went to a nearby door not far from this school I asked the man who took the flowers in about it and he told me he thought they were about 16 or 17 years old and part of a sixth form running group or something like that. So clearly running like that is back in vogue at this place. But interesting all the same and I have to admit they looked healthy, so well done to them for that.

That is amazing, considering what you said Jason, the subject matter, and the time of day/night, and timing, that you said that just one minute after Alan. You literally both clicked at the same time. Thanks to the IP we can see all is okay though but interesting you felt you had to cover yourself there Jason, that was quite amazing to notice all the same. An interesting link. I'm just pleased that all my boys were happy in their skin enough never to worry about these things with anyone at all.

I most certainly was not describing you personally as pampered by your parents Alan, how could I possibly know that? But I will let it go as you have admitted to your over sensitivity so that's alright by me. What I was writing was a general take and didn't even mention you directly, just well meaning advice which didn't need to be re-interpreted into a psychoanalysis of your own self which was not the intention.




Comment by: Jason on 15th February 2024 at 04:32
Bit of an early one for me. I promise I'm not Alan in disguise though.

One for the shy boys out there.

https://www.yourotherbrothers.com/2016/03/15/why-im-afraid-to-take-off-my-shirt/

IP Logged: *.***.95.147

Comment by: Alan on 15th February 2024 at 04:31
Comment by: Paula - B.S Health & Education, Physical Education - Florida University (1977) on 14th February 2024 at 21:15

It seems America is much more advanced in it's thinking, Paula, and has consideration for pupils. I have said on here many times that if a lad wishes to take his shirt off, that is fine.

An interesting batch of posts last evening

IP Logged: ***.**.3.244

This from Ben here recently, 'Of course some lads were a lot more confident, there was one in my class who would regularly 'forget' his PE vest and apologise rather half-heartedly. The teacher didn't seem too bothered and the end result was that he did a lot of PE bare chested. I'd guess some others here might have done the same or knew someone else who did?'



You've just jogged my mind on something myself here. One of our PE years when I was somewhere around about thirteen had three or four boys who constantly came in with reasons for not having the expected vest on we wore mostly, and one of our PE teachers would allow them to just do class without it. Perhaps it was deliberate and they liked it, never thought about it, but it never seemed like an attempt to not do PE because they had the other kit on them. So one day another PE teacher came into our class, the main man as it were in PE, and asked my PE teacher why there were two or three boys not wearing their PE vests and asked if it had happened before. We had to stop what we were doing while this conversation was going on. I remember listening and wondering why it really mattered so much. We were all supposed to look the same for PE at my school at that age (this was about 1980/1 time). In the end he told our teacher to "just get their vest off then" and went, and our teacher yapped "you heard what he said" and we all had to pull our vest off over our heads and do PE like that for the whole term. That went down very badly I can tell you, when our school had an actual kit and because of a few boys who kept failing to bring it like they should we all had to bow to them in that way just to keep the main PE teacher happy that class was being done the same for everyone.

The school then ordered some new vests and everyone got one and they must have over ordered or something because there were quite a few spares so following term when we were back in our PE vests again one or two of these boys would sometimes still turn up without, just refusing to learn anything but they always had a vest given to them. It's quite possible therefore that they wanted to do PE bare chested but couldn't. But even though we had vests for PE in usual circumstances at all other times other than when I described, we took them off on a regular basis for skins and shirts games and at other points. For example, I remember when we used to do the rope climbing we were told to take our vest off before climbing it for some reason. The oddities of PE at times.

Often when you have certain thoughts like you did Ben, and Alan and others, you think you are the only one having them, especially if nobody else is much speaking about them. It's now clear to me that males, at all ages, not just school age, have such sensations. You said your heart sank, that's an interesting reaction for example. But obviously school is where you first discover these feelings about yourself and as we all know and I've described above in my own case, school was rarely about choices, it was about being told what to do and doing it, and that applies to many other things you might not have enjoyed as well. But PE does have that extra special place in most people's memories for the unique reasons associated with it that could very visibly affect people.

Bit of an early one for me. I promise I'm not Alan in disguise though.

One for the shy boys out there.

https://www.yourotherbrothers.com/2016/03/15/why-im-afraid-to-take-off-my-shirt/

Comment by: Paula - B.S Health & Education, Physical Education - Florida University (1977) on 14th February 2024 at 21:15



It seems America is much more advanced in it's thinking, Paula, and has consideration for pupils. I have said on here many times that if a lad wishes to take his shirt off, that is fine, if they have the confidence to do that, but - certainly in my time - virtually no consideration was shown. Britain tries to pretend it is like America - a 24/7 economy, but in truth, we are still like a village, with early closing day, where trains stop at weekends for engineering works for weeks at a time, and half an inch of snow brings the entire country to a standstill and so on. Thanks for showing a more tolerant attitude is possible. Over here, with all due respect to them, a lot of readers on here have said in effect, "it did me no harm" and seem aggrieved that modern girls and lads might get it just a bit "easier" now. The fact is we were not subjected to the almost constant testing and mock exams they have now, from a very early age. In Britain we seem to have adopted an almost "military" style, of PE teaching, but the irony of it was, that conscription, forcing people into the army at 18, stopped over 60 years ago, but this sort of regime carried ion in schools into the 80s and 90s. It might have been useful in the days when a lad was forced into military service at 18, to "toughen them up", but I see no reason for it to be persisted in thirty years later.

I wish I had been American, and living on the West Coast!. It would have done my musical career no harm at all.



Comment by: Chapman on 14th February 2024 at 20:34


I agree with your comments. As regards me at 14 - 6 stone, 5ft 4 ins, terrible acne (face and chest) red skin every rib showing (one of my nicknames at that time was "TinRibs" also used by that charmer of a teacher, R, in a pejorative sneering way: - me at 18 - 8 stone 5ft 9 ins, acne there still, but clearing up. I was much more confident and never bullied - except by a trumpet playing bandleader who worshipped Maynard Ferguson and thought every trumpet player should be able to play C above C, without even a warm-up, but he did that to everyone, and he could never turn violent. We all laughed at it and treated it as a joke.

Comment by: Stephen on 14th February 2024 at 18:09


Like you, our showers were more or less cold - tepid, at best, I suppose is the best description. I am sure the plumbing system was as old as the school itself. We had that curious system where the pipes and radiators operated due to the "hot" water running through them, like the system used in Victorian greenhouses, They were never warm enough for an old building though, simply because, unlike a greenhouse, there was too much brick and not enough glass, to capitalize on the sun's warmth, but I understood that, because the building had been earmarked for closure for years and it would have been a waste of money to install a modern system. They were promising to close it the year I arrived. It only got torn down, and turned into a supermarket after I had left - every little helps!

I have to say the "right you have two minutes to shower" jazz was just about control again. They didn't give a toss whether you showered properly or not, it was just the fact they could tell you to do it. Just as long as your hair was wet....The watching us at all times, in shower and changing room was also part of our experience. I hope your teachers motives were not the same as ours, Stephen.

An interesting batch of posts last evening

THIS THIS THIS!

<what I couldn't stand was being surrounded by others (I was an only child which probably explains a lot), and being screamed and shouted at like Lionel Jeffries in Two Way Stretch (as Prison Officer Crout) - they wanted you under the bloody things then gave you two minutes before he was screeching at you to get out.>



The shower hustle and bustle as I would call it, you had to be quick as a flash once back to change, especially if your next lesson and teacher was waiting almost immediately, be out of everything you had on rapid or get a teacher in your face and send you packing in with the other lads. We got back out when they decided we were done, that could be quicker with some teachers than others. We all had to have wet hair on the way out and be dripping before picking a towel up again.

PE was 65 minutes long on the timetable. It moved around the day while I had it. I preferred it in afternoon. Without an immediate follow on lesson there was less 'shower hassle to get a move on' but it was always a bit of a free for all. Believe it or not there were boys in my school PE class who actually liked to bag the same place in the shower under the same exact shower head every time. How do I know this, well I was one of them!

Gymnastics comes from the Greek, to exercise naked, well you learn something new every day. Never knew that, although I did know that the ancient Greek Olympics long before the modern ones were competed naked. Quite a spectacle I'm sure. To go back to that time and see just how fit and muscly these men really were at such a time would be fascinating I'm sure. Time machine anyone? But women put to death if they watched the men, is that some kind of ancient prudery or something going on. A history lesson beckons I think, going back a bit further than the few decades on here.

Just to take the year of what appears your graduation Paula, a year I was in school, and believe me here in the UK at that time PE teachers very much did make boys go shirtless whether they liked it or not as I was on the receiving end. I was lukewarm about it I suppose is the best way to describe it. I've rarely gone shirtless in company since the days of school PE, possibly a couple of holidays briefly in a quiet beach but that's it really.

Body image. That didn't matter one iota here in the UK, no matter how low your body image was, how crushingly shy or self critical or conscious you were about yourself, how scared you might even be about it, they still made you do it without a second thought to anyone's actual feelings about themselves. That was the times.

I realise that there has recently been a more up to date current teacher of PE come along on here and state he expects shirtless PE at times and asks for it but at least he did seem fully aware of possible feelings those pupils might have and sounded like a potential listener. I'm not sure that applied in my time.

Chapman, the 18 year old me had a 28 inch waist and was less than 10 stone and now I've got a 32 inch waist and am just under 12 stone, and am probably happier with the latter actually and have managed to avoid the dreaded manboob appearance or belly overhanging the belt look too. I'm happy with the way I look in middle age. I've seen some I was in school with who were very fit lean boys much like the one in the red shorts in the Grange Hill clip that someone here said they looked like and they have doubled in size and I wonder just how that happened to them. Food probably. Too much.

The recent description of being screamed at to go showering and then get out, that mentioned Lionel Jeffries was different to mine, once in we could spend a good while in if we wanted. But they made you get in, I think PE teachers must have been on a bonus system for how many boys they could get showered they seemed so keen to see we all did it, and like I just said to Paula regards the shirtless PE she spoke about, here in the UK the school shower in the year I mentioned was just about universally across the land in all places mandatory for all school children between the ages of 11 and 16, whether you liked your body image and were deeply shy and unhappy about it or not. Nobody cared much or would dream to talk about your self esteem on body image issues. But we all went through the same. There cannot be a man in the UK who is aged 40 or above who has never shared a communal shower with a group of people, primarily at school, it must be almost 100%. It seems that even the shirtless PE is likely to have been close to 100% as well, covering those who always did it to those who might have done skins games or those who did it just now and then for other reasons, leaving swimming aside which was also mentioned by you Paula.

"I was quite unconfident in PE and had to take my shirt off, so I understood Ben's points. I certainly don't object to it and having had to do so. It was just my own personality. But I always became much more confident when we swam at school. I wonder Ben if you felt similar in that regard?"

Interesting point Mark made about swimming and yes, I'd completely agree. For me it definitely felt far less a big deal to take my top off for swimming lessons than it did for PE in the gym. Firstly I suppose it seemed more normal, I'd been to swimming pools and beaches before and didn't wear more than a pair of trunks or shorts.
The other point of course was that every boy was dressed the same way for swimming. In the gym though, we didn't have any lessons with everyone bare chested, so it could feel quite unfair to be chosen for skins in that regard. I remember quite early on I'd had consecutive PE lessons bare chested and thought surely I'd get to keep my vest on next time! So my heart sank when the teacher said 'skins' yet again.
Of course some lads were a lot more confident, there was one in my class who would regularly 'forget' his PE vest and apologise rather half-heartedly. The teacher didn't seem too bothered and the end result was that he did a lot of PE bare chested. I'd guess some others here might have done the same or knew someone else who did?

Hi, I'm a B.S in Health & Education and also Physical Education at the Uni of Florida in 1977.

This from an old account I used elsewhere I'd like to share from the Stateside perspective right now. Your schools over there in the UK are known to have been very different to ours but what I say here only relates to my county and not nationally across the entire country where rules are vastly different from place to place.

Physical Education teachers don’t MAKE boys go shirtless. If they get overheated during exercise they might be allowed to remove their shirt, depending on the regulations of their school. But it is unlikely that a boy who was shy or had a poor body image would be required to take his shirt off.

Males in general do not wear shirts while swimming, but if a boy was shy and wanted to wear a shirt that was tight fitting, or wanted to wear the type of swim suit that competitive swimmers wear (with a tank top) NO ONE WOULD CARE.

Most schools have some kind of uniform or dress code for physical education classes. Where as girls participating in sports frequently wear leotards or sports bras. These don’t leave much to the imagination.

To take this a step further the word Gymnastics comes from the Greek, which means to exercise naked. Women were not allow to watch or attend these competitions on pain of death. Is that fair? Who knows?

As my husband and partner in our gymnastics school used to tell our gymnasts “Life’s not fair and then you die. Go to Heaven and learn to fly. Find out that there’s a tax on flying.”

Lack of body confidence is very common. You really shouldn't care what others think though. If you really are that anxious about it, then do something about it. Go down the gym, get yourself toned up and you're confidence will grow very quickly indeed. I know, been there and done it.

I do wish PE teachers would understand this point though. Just saying the few words above to those with confidence issues could be a big help I'm sure. Boys like this were not alone, they were everywhere. School could be unforgiving for those who had these confidence issues in the past and some PE teachers clearly just made things worse for some.

Perhaps a light hearted question for the forum men here.

What was your own schooldays body like at say the age of 14, or maybe 18 just after school, and how does that PE or younger body compare to the man and shape you are in now? I'm one of those who has remained the same weight and size almost all my adult life remarkably without having had to try very hard other than regular but not excessive exercise. But I overcame the lack of body confidence I had at school mainly regarding the use of the nude showering rules quite fast. Being forced into a situation like that made me face my fears and overcome them rather effectively I thought.

Comment by: Chris G on 14th February 2024 at 15:50
"It's getting very difficult to follow the thread of many of the recent "he said, she said" type of conversations, where previous postings are dissected and analysed at length and to death. If you are quoting what a previous poster has written, I wonder if you could try to indicate this, either by enclosing quoted material in "quotation marks", beginning and end, or by indicating the start of a quote by showing the author, as in a theatrical script."


I like your timing Chris G and the latest post that came through from Stephen in the batch of three comments along with yours does exactly as you ask to perfection!


I actually think it's a shame that posts are not individually numbered, not just by IP address, but in chronological order like many forums. We know there have currently been 6043 posts here but not what number they are. Dates are checkable back but a numbered comment has benefits too.


I am pleased that some liked the Flickr photos of my own school gym I was able to provide on 6th February from Filton High in the mid 70's, I got as much bare chested PE in gym as it was possible to get at that time. I noted the points others made about why the photo may have been taken at the time.

Alan you said,

'what I couldn't stand was being surrounded by others (I was an only child which probably explains a lot), and being screamed and shouted at like Lionel Jeffries in Two Way Stretch (as Prison Officer Crout) - they wanted you under the bloody things then gave you two minutes before he was screeching at you to get out.'


You should have had a teacher who timed you, like I said two weeks ago,

'our teacher would get his stopwatch out and time what I think was something like 2 minutes 30 seconds after we went in before anyone was let back out again to dry and dress. Watched constantly and often told to shut up while we did so because of the noise. Sometimes the water went almost completely cold on us, meaning more noise, but we were not let out until the stopwatch said so according to our teacher. A bit over the top I agree, nothing wrong with just letting everyone come and go and get on with it but that's how it was for me in 1974'

Can I just say what a beautifully written comment that was from Ethan that you picked out TimH. Classy from both of you. It took me back to seeing a photo artist a few years ago who would gather large groups of people together in public spaces and take pictures. I always disliked it, simply for the association those large numbers had with the things you both describe.

Tim, you picked up Tony on a comment about some gym photos. While I agree that Flickr is indeed a historical record I think the point was missed there maybe, as Flickr didn't exist in the time they were taken, so the pictures must have been used for another purpose. Possibly a school magazine or something at the time. I'm sure it was all above board though, the photos a good snapshot of what was an ordinary day's gym lesson.

I was quite unconfident in PE and had to take my shirt off, so I understood Ben's points. I certainly don't object to it and having had to do so. It was just my own personality. But I always became much more confident when we swam at school. I wonder Ben if you felt similar in that regard?

It's nice to get answers to questions that get posed. Such as the one from the Mumsnet forum about the 15 year old son who didn't want to swim shirtless that never received a final conclusion after the initial question was asked, which I wrote about on 1st Feb here. Also Yorkshire Dad and the change in rules at his school would be a nice one to get more about as others have said.

There was a comment or two about pampering parents. No teenage boy wants his mum and dad interfering in things much on anything. I saw that Nathan's last post said he'd had some parents approach him about PE matters to do with showers but not any of the children. Did anyone have any parents like that who caused a fuss over things while you were in school about PE then or were questioning things? I think I once gave a note to a PE teacher when I fell off my bike on the way home from school the night before and bruised myself badly and was let off not just that lesson but the one after it too, not at my parents request but my actual PE teacher insisted on it.

It's getting very difficult to follow the thread of many of the recent "he said, she said" type of conversations, where previous postings are dissected and analysed at length and to death. If you are quoting what a previous poster has written, I wonder if you could try to indicate this, either by enclosing quoted material in "quotation marks", beginning and end, or by indicating the start of a quote by showing the author, as in a theatrical script.

Ben,

Thanks for that answer. I think I can well remember boys like you in school PE lessons Ben. In some ways it's quite endearing. I have to admit that although scribbling a number on your upper body in biro was a bit naff, I didn't enjoy wearing scratchy yellow bibs when it was my turn and just preferred the no shirt look because it was more comfortable than an awkward bib just to separate teams. I just don't know why they didn't ask us to bring vests or tea-shirts when we needed to do that. They made team selections a bigger deal than they needed to be sometimes, but that is what happens in a school where all boys go shirtless automatically on arrival for PE at the gym. It makes doing team games a bit difficult among a couple of dozen plain white skinned regular looking boys, but I do recall as we got older some size differences became more apparent and also build. Some had a growth spurt in months, others stayed stick thin and others seemed to become generally a bit bigger later on. Heights started to become more different among us. Watching others the same age change over a four year period can be interesting to compare with, I found it so. Few ever dare admit it, even on here I see, but tell me a boy who didn't secretly like to compare himself to the others as well where it mattered most. That little glance down and back up again, pretending not to notice the obvious in the shower for instance when we were all doing it really. Why deny it. That was an education in itself to me. I don't know about you or others. Everyone has always got a story to tell about school and showering I've found, if they are over forty. Literally nobody forgets them or how it happened to them. Although I thought the Grange Hill scenes of PE and changing rooms and showers were very mild really, nothing too terrible.

There was one thing that Alan said, and it was about being hassled to hurry up and get out of your PE kit and run into the showers quickly, yes, that was my experience too, and as soon as you'd done it, as soon as you'd managed to actually get wet you were being hassled and hurried to get back out again and dressed before you'd even had a proper shower with some teachers, who seemed to just want you to be put through the situation of doing it rather than actually genuinely showering properly. I got that sometimes and it's very relatable.

I did enjoy your line Sean, "I consented to showers and shirtless PE at school. I consented to them being mandatory!" That was funny. That's the kind of line you could just hear coming out of the mouth of an exasperated PE teacher at some point isn't it.

But I still don't think anyone in school in our time, or now like Nathan, should actually have to feel they should justify themselves if they wish to take a class without shirts or make them shower. I just don't. I saw somebody on that Mumsnet chat that got linked on here a couple of weeks ago and someone wrote "My body, my choice". That is meaningless sloganising. In school as a child you do as you are told. Call me old fashioned. We have got far too many young and overly entitled young people around nowadays who think they can dictate everything and can't be told anything.

Comment by: David on 13th February 2024 at 18:23


I was using my work computer when I wrote my last reply, which for some reason always makes my name more "formal" Windows 11, worse than Windows 10, which I use "indoors".

I think what I was saying was quite clear. If I may so say so you have decided I was "pampered" as a kid (far from the truth, but I let that pass) and that I regard myself as having victim status. Again not true, but even amateur psychology can be interesting - to those providing it.

I an not making "excuses for anything".

If there is a genuine point about anything you feel that I have not been clear on, then by all means say what it is. Frankly, I sense some antipathy in your response to my posting, and I am not inclined , to subject the readers on here to the sort of slanging matches we had towards the end of 2023, But please do not presume to think you know anything about my background. You have made a couple of assumptions which are erroneous.

Going back to PE for 16 y.o. boys - personal experiences from the 6th Form of a Boys Technical Grammar in the East Midlands - 1965-67.
'Games' was still on the timetable but numbers of us avoided it because we were involved in 'Activities' (Societies) for the younger boys (some of us were also 'lab boys' in the chemistry labs). This didn't get us out of the annual school cross-country championship, which I found I quite enjoyed.
'Gym' was on the timetable and most of us attended. It seemed to have 'matured' rather and was aimed more at 'personal fitness' - circuit training & the like and extensive games of basketball - I think we chose who would be 'skins' & 'shirts' ourselves. Gym kit was white shorts and, if you wanted it, a white top - I recall people wearing either a T-shirt or a singlet (or, on one occasion , a string vest - to cries of: 'That won't keep you very warm'), or topless. This was the mid 60s so shorts were moving from the longer, baggy variety to the shorter type - think 1966 World Cup, but still in cotton - not nylon. This was an age where Mum bought your sports kit for you - larger than needed, but 'you'll grow into it'. I've a horrible feeling I still hadn't grown into my shorts by 6th Form, but I (& three or four more) went to the sports department of the local outfitters one lunchtime and bought some new ones - there were mutters from assorted Mothers that they were 'too short', but we just smiled. None of our experiences seemed to harm us and, to be honest, I'm not aware of the 'physical punishment' that took place in other schools, although I know of one occasion when it almost certainly did happen (& deservedly so).
Laurence says: 'Expectation were very high at that time. Very few boys seemed incapable of the tasks given them. While they were generally friendly PE teachers they were also tolerant of no fooling around or dangerous antics' & 'In 1962 grammar nobody was interested in things like your own personal body space or your personal privacy. The concept simply did not really exist. Whether we were fully dressed in our school uniform and blazers or whether we were completely naked before or after PE was almost irrelevant, to our teachers anyway, and many of us boys at least on the surface'. I agree with him.

Ethan says: 'School showering reminded me of that at first when I did it, seeing so many others wearing nothing together being controlled into a location. Even though it was innocent I felt a connection and to this day feel a sense come over me when I have ever seen even innocent pictures of large groups of people wearing nothing. Even in the holocaust they didn't even spare the youngest children so I'd never wish to feel sorry for myself in school being asked to take my own clothes off and face a short lived taunt for how I looked in PE while having a shower. Compelling me to shower in school as a child was nothing compared to what others of my faith must have gone through at young ages long ago. I weep for them all'.
Thank You for saying this ... I suppose I was in the First Form at Secondary School when the Adolf Eichmann trial took place. I have an indelible memory of a group of us little boys in the 'playground' talking about 'The Camps' and how ... 'they made them take all their clothes off' ... 'and lined them up' - it wasn't in the 'distant past' back in 1961.

Tony - you say about the Filton photographs: 'no permission was probably sought for those, whilst today I'm sure you absolutely would have to do so and account for the reason for taking them'. How do you know this? Did you look at the rest of the Flickr album. I'd say someone was keeping a good 'historic' record of the school.

Grange Hill - never watched it - but a school teacher friend reckoned everyone in his staff room did - just to keep up with what might happen at school the next day.

And the cricket bat - yes - in America its called 'paddling', I believe.

Enough from me for tonight.

I consented to showers and shirtless PE at school. I consented to them being mandatory!

Thanks for your answers Alan. We are complete opposites though.

Alan/ALAN GILES - I presume these are the same person, I noticed a somewhat different IP number so I hope you have not been mimicked as it looks like you don't usually use your surname or write in block capitals and I can see there were issues a few weeks ago I read through.

Anyway, back so soon, noticed my post up, didn't intend to add more but one thing caught my eye about what you have said and I just want to ask about it.

You said - not only have a very good sense of recall, but I remember the sights, smells and feelings, whatever the event might be which are evoked, of how I felt at the time, and a great disinclination to revisit them.


I'm quite surprised given the above statement that you feel so inclined to revisit this type of discussion so much in that case, as this must also cause you to trigger memories you would rather not revisit, yes/no, and you were the person who provided the information about the children's show that you have never watched.

I am confused a touch and would just like to ask you rather politely what exactly you see your aims being here?

I would certainly like to draw your close attention to the final few sentences of my second post which has just been published this evening here. That's my lot here anyway. I've said all that I want to say.

Comment by: Sean on 13th February 2024 at 02:34


No Sean, I am lucky - I don't think I would have PTSD over anything, but it is just I not only have a very good sense of recall, but I remember the sights, smells and feelings, whatever the event might be which are evoked, of how I felt at the time, and a great disinclination to revisit them. For example I can never smell "Brut" ("splash it on", Henry Cooper), without feeling nausea because the first bandroom I ever went in reeked of the stuff and I remember how scared I was feeling. Brut equalled nausea - though I guess it did for many men - horrible stuff.

Like you - and I know this will come as a surprise to many on here, I loved showers, because at home we had a bath and I never liked the idea of bathing in my own dirt. I got very hot very easily so I welcomed them, but what I couldn't stand was being surrounded by others (I was an only child which probably explains a lot), and being screamed and shouted at like Lionel Jeffries in Two Way Stretch (as Prison Officer Crout) - they wanted you under the bloody things then gave you two minutes before he was screeching at you to get out. These days I start off my day with a shower, and often another if it has been a dirty dusty day, or hot, after work. I haven't had a bath in years.

I'm sorry you had rotten employers - I was the opposite, and I had some really patient and kind ones, who made me realize that not every adult in authority were the total b****ards I had experienced at school. They called you by your first name, asked how you were, did you enjoy your weekend, were you happy with everything at work?. Even in my first very junior job it was always "would you mind....." (posting a letter or the like). When did a teacher ever ask you anything like that?. In retrospect my happiest years were between 18 and 28.

Comment by: Jeff on 13th February 2024 at 14:00


"Just a quick clarification though Alan on this shirtless/showering thing, do you consider that to be a form of abuse if asked to do in school nowadays? Because I most certainly do not, but you give the impression to me that you do think so."

Not if it is consensual, Jeff, that is, if the lads are happy to be shirtless and they are not gawped at and barked at, as we were, in the showers. Since Nathan told us last week that over 16s are not forced to
take part in PE that has reassured me a bit. I know with terrible acne, even on my chest, when I was 17 or so, I would have dreaded showering in a group, but I suppose there is an argument that if a 17/18 year does want to take part, it is only fair he takes part in all of the lesson, including the shower. Me I would have run like a stag from it. I still feel, however, that there is nothing wrong with a standard tee shirt as part of the uniform, at all ages 11 upwards, they are lightweight, and for lads like my mate with a very noticeable scar, it would have saved him years of embarrassment. Anyway, to answer your question, Jeff: abuse? - no, insensitive? - yes, in cases like that.

There is absolutely nothing abusive about shirtless PE or showering, even if you are being made to do so, such as at school. That is a stretch too far even in these days, most definitely on the shirtless PE aspect for sure. I said as much in my first post here on 28th January actually.

I did these things long in the past, never felt aggrieved, and I've had five children, four of them boys, all now grown adults and all of them did these things quite a while back and it would never cross my mind to think they were being abused simply for being told to do these things in a PE class. It was all compulsory, and the boys I had started showers regularly with PE at the age of only 8 in the primary school which was less common. I did things later than they all did. It might have helped them earlier, who can possibly know.

We might have discussed the issue at some point, I'm sure we did, like many school things with parents, but I have no recollection of any desires from any of them not to do these things or feeling sorry for themselves about it and me and their mother would not have been remotely concerned either at such requirements.

If you had parents that did over pamper like that they might actually cause hang ups that the child would never have had in the first place.

I wouldn't even consider a couple of my children as extroverts, far from it, they are sensitive, quiet and possibly a bit shy but I'd also say were and are sensible and pragmatic.

Doing some sport, any sport or activity that gets you going, either alone or with others makes you more confident even if you are a sensitive person. The gentleman who has gained a group of barechest adult runners has been making some of these points I can see on here, and he's right.

If you are one of those here who had these problems, or maybe still does in adulthood I'd say push yourself out of the comfort zone you've been in and break out of the cycle of pointless fear holding you back.

Unconfident, shy and retiring children at school do not automatically have to grow up into the same as adults. One thing I learnt from doing some youth work for a short while was that some boys who thought they were unconfident and shy or useless were not as much as they thought when put to the test, and that includes a couple of my own sons in that.

Some people do feel safe remaining within the victim status they have created for themselves in their lives. This is just terribly poisonous.

You're entitled to be sensitive to things, anxious, nervous, of course. But they should not be used as an excuse in themselves.

A couple of good posts since last night.

Wasn't padding something they used to do a lot in American schools back in those days, with something not too different in shape to a cricket bat?

Of course it's quite objectionable now to read about, but that was over 60 years ago now. It's always impossible to detach yourself from the time you live in and remember the past entirely as it once was, even if it was within your own living memory. There have been massive changes in thinking in just the past 10 years.

But someone has already said it, and I'd like to add, that we must do our best to avoid making this thread an obsessed discussion focusing too much on abusive practices as we now see them, and these things no longer happen as policy, that's a good thing everyone will agree I hope.

Just a quick clarification though Alan on this shirtless/showering thing, do you consider that to be a form of abuse if asked to do in school nowadays? Because I most certainly do not, but you give the impression to me that you do think so.

Comment by: Laurence on 12th February 2024 at 23:38

"I remember there was a cricket bat in the gym propped up. It was always there and I always wondered why, it had no use in the gym to anyone, until the day there was some tomfoolery and the cricket bat was picked up by my PE teacher who dragged two boys to the horse, pulled their shorts down and batted both their behinds twice very hard before putting the bat back exactly as it was. One boy cried his eyes out, through pain and I think the humiliation of it...... We were only boys of 12 & 13."

I'm sorry, Lawrence, you might not agree with me - perhaps many others on the site won;t agree with me, but I think that is disgusting behaviour. Even in 1962, I am sure, if you substituted the word "boy" for "dog" in that sentence, the RSPCA would have, very rightly, prosecuted that "man" for cruelty. The same standards should have been in place for children.

There is a very fine line between where sadism ends and perversion begins, and in my opinion, he got very close to that line. The best you can say for him was that he had what would be called today "anger management" issues. Though it was years later, even my teacher would not have dared to behave like that in semi-public.

Was using a cricket bat like that legal in the early sixties? The cane probably hurt much more though. Given a choice, and I don't know how either feels, I would have opted to take a bat. There must have been teachers who used these things and would strike with them harder than others. This kind of instant justice without any further say does not come over well now when we can always appeal decisions. In my view only the head should have ever had the ability to agree to such punishments. There was a film on here last year that showed something that was a shower punishment ordered by a head, somewhere quite a few pages back.

But I'm another child of the 80s I'm afraid and nobody was getting treated like that in my time as a teenager then in school. I left in 1985.

My claim to fame I can make is that when I started at the big one I was rather keen on physical sports and team games and ended up being the very first boy darting into the showers on our first day, I had them to myself, I couldn't wait to get in and give them a try out. I was always eager and fearless like that. Nothing and nobody intimidated me that easily. A school shower was never going to do that and I can't believe it did for so many, or that PE did in general. You are allowed to be useless at something as long as you try. My teacher once said that to me, never forgot it. Remember that guys and pass it to any young ones you know now in school. Life is not always about succeeding, it's about trying.

I loved Grange Hill. I think I watched it from the start and for the next 8 to 10 years, even after I'd left school and was in my first job being exploited by an employer wanting a supply of young cheap labour on YTS as an alleged trainee office tea boy doing a full working week for literally nothing, and even some half day Saturdays the cheek of it. I might as well have been back at school, I enjoyed it more than my first two or three out of it. A bit of less recent modern day slavery for you there.

How well were PE teachers paid compared to the other staff anyway? Is it a well paid job now. They get another week off next week already and we're just back from Christmas holidays, and they have no marking books to do.

You are a bit wet not wanting to watch Grange Hill Alan. It must be your school down to a tee. It's actually quite tame stuff when you look at it now. Are you saying it gives you PTSD then? Try some of the later ones from the first half of the 80s then, they were great. You must have been one of those boys who never watched all the things that the others would talk about in the playground at break time from TV in those days. Almost everyone I knew watched Grange Hill and loved it at the time. I just looked up Todd Carty's age and he's SIXTY for christ's sake. How did that happen so quickly? Those first kids all must be now, how quick life goes, kids to almost pensionable in the blink of an eye. I'm now quite depressed to think about it. What is it they say - life happens to you while you're thinking about making plans, or something similar.

Sigh. Give me back those schooldays, warts and all.

There are a lot of 70s & 80s schooldays memories here at the moment but mine goes right back to 1962 at a time not far removed from the pictoral representation above this discussion and my PE lesson at grammar school looked very similar to the above image. I remember it all in vivid colour however.

Expectation were very high at that time. Very few boys seemed incapable of the tasks given them. While they were generally friendly PE teachers they were also tolerant of no fooling around or dangerous antics.

I remember there was a cricket bat in the gym propped up. It was always there and I always wondered why, it had no use in the gym to anyone, until the day there was some tomfoolery and the cricket bat was picked up by my PE teacher who dragged two boys to the horse, pulled their shorts down and batted both their behinds twice very hard before putting the bat back exactly as it was. One boy cried his eyes out, through pain and I think the humiliation of it. He was rubbing away but had to carry on as if nothing had happened after it. The whole thing happened so fast and then it was done. No recovery time was allowed, or time to feel sorry for yourself about it. I never looked at the cricket bat in the same way again. When we showered I saw they had a very red bottom each and the teacher made us take note of this fact. We were only boys of 12 & 13.

Although corporal punishment was rife in that time I rarely saw a beating like that. I received the plimsoll on my own bottom a year earlier, again in PE for something too trivial, forgetting something I think it was.

When I think of my school grammar PE gym lessons I only ever think of them as being done without any tops on, in the stripped to the waist look, without vests or t-shirts on of any type. I have no memory of ever having done a shirts and skins game at school, most team games took place outside, but we must have done some in our gym but how we could tell each other apart is vague at this distance.

In 1962 grammar nobody was interested in things like your own personal body space or your personal privacy. The concept simply did not really exist. Whether we were fully dressed in our school uniform and blazers or whether we were completely naked before or after PE was almost irrelevant, to our teachers anyway, and many of us boys at least on the surface. We had punishment showers at our school, you could get that for insolence to a senior teacher of any subject and be sent off to cool down, literally.

When I've read about Gordonstoun where the King went and hated I've often thought it sounded like my own place quite a lot.